Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Verena Meliss vs Camilla Scala Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Meliss vs Scala analysis and find out who is favored!
Verena Meliss vs Camilla Scala Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Meliss 1 - 1 Scala
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Meliss has won 40.79% of points on their second serve, while Scala has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Meliss, in recent form, has won 58.78% of their opponent's second serve points, while Scala has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.66% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Meliss has saved 49.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Scala has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Meliss has won 53.7% of matches played (W/L 29/ 25), with Scala winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Meliss has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 145/ 164). Scala has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 157/ 121), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Meliss has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 16/ 18), where as Scala has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Meliss winning 1 times and Scala being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Meliss winning 3 and Scala winning 3. The last match between Meliss and Scala was at the W25 Santa Margherita Di Pula, 13-09-2019, Second, Clay with Camilla Scala getting the victory 1-6 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Meliss and Scala have played a deciding set 2 times, with Meliss winning 1 times and Scala 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Meliss winning 1, and Scala 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Meliss has played against opponents with an average rank of 201.28 while Scala has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Meliss has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Scala has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Meliss has converted 53.58% of breakpoint opportunities, and Scala has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
661
Rank
487
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
391
High
29
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
48% (198-216)
Career Total W/L
54% (170-142)
61% (20-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Verena Meliss vs Camilla Scala For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Meliss VS Scala
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Verena Meliss | Camilla Scala |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 26 | 28 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:19:30 | 2:19:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (124/194) | 65% (114/176) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (68/124) | 53% (60/114) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 39% (27/70) | 48% (30/62) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (12/22) | 48% (14/29) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (86/176) | 51% (99/194) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Camilla Scala
Player
Verena Meliss
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 2-6 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Camilla Scala
56%
(
55 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
9
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
52%
(
51 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
51 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Verena Meliss | Camilla Scala |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (20/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (43/30) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (361/285) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 61% (19/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 58 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.51 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 161 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:54 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 179.45 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1305/2011) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (808/1305) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (288/706) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (157/293) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (980/1958) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (11/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (19/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (21/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (21/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Verena Meliss Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Timea Jaruskova
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
31 of
41)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Verena Meliss
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Valeriya Yushchenko
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
12
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
54%
(
51 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
59 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Selina Atay
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve %
43%
(
18 of
42)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anika Jaskova
Player
Verena Meliss
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Dana Baidaulet
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Doga Turkmen
60%
(
72 of
121)
1st Serve %
73%
(
82 of
112)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
37%
(
18 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
10 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
49%
(
59 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
112)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Verena Meliss
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Camilla Scala Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Detiuc
Player
Camilla Scala
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve %
46%
(
6 of
13)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
9
|
4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Camilla Scala
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve %
46%
(
13 of
28)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
42
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilla Scala
Player
Stefania Rubini
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilla Scala
Player
Lisa Pigato
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilla Scala
Player
Deborah Chiesa
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 7-6(0) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilla Scala
Player
Verena Meliss
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentyna Ivakhnenko
Player
Camilla Scala
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilla Scala
Player
Claire Liu
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
2
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Meliss Vs Scala Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Meliss are available here and Scala photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
